Testimony of Sergio De La Pava Legal Director New York County Defender Services Before the City Council Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure Oversight – Fair Fares May 7, 2026
Testimony of
Sergio De La Pava
Legal Director
New York County Defender Services
Before the
City Council Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure
Oversight - Fair Fares
May 7, 2026
Thank you, Chair Abreu, for holding this oversight hearing on Fair Fares. My name is Sergio De
La Pava and I am the Legal Director of New York County Defender Services (NYCDS).
NYCDS is a public defense office that every year represents indigent New Yorkers in thousands
of cases in Manhattan’s Criminal Court, Supreme Court, and Family Courts. Since opening our
doors in 1997, we have represented more than half a million clients in their criminal matters and
witnessed firsthand the myriad ways the criminal legal system abuses and harms our clients.
We regularly see the ways transportation insecurity destabilizes individuals and families, and
contributes to deeper involvement with the criminal legal system. For our clients, reliable access
to public transportation is critical in maintaining employment, attending court appearances,
accessing healthcare and treatment, meeting with counsel, and successfully navigating reentry
after a period of incarceration.
I. Background:
For many of our clients, transportation costs present a substantial and recurring hardship. Our
clients routinely describe having to ration MetroCard swipes or having to ask family or friends
for money to afford transportation to court. Clients may have to walk long distances to get to
appointments, or simply may miss them when they cannot afford to pay a transit fare.Reentry frequently requires navigating numerous appointments across multiple boroughs within
short periods of time, including meetings with parole or probation officers, benefits offices,
housing providers, treatment courts, or attorneys. The total cost of transportation can quickly
become prohibitive for individuals already facing serious economic hardship.
Transportation insecurity can also increase exposure to law enforcement. Low-income New
Yorkers who cannot afford to pay their transit fares routinely face summonses, arrests, or other
enforcement actions stemming from fare evasion.1 Even limited police interactions can carry
significant consequences for individuals already navigating court involvement, house instability,
immigration concerns, or supervision requirements.
Fare evasion enforcement in New York City has also historically disproportionately impacted
low-income Black and Latino communities. NYPD enforcement data found that fare evasion
enforcement was significantly higher and more punitive in lower-income neighborhoods where
people of color live, when compared to similarly situated white neighborhoods.2 Police were also
more likely to arrest individuals from minority neighborhoods rather than issuing a summons.3
Enforcement relative to ridership was more than 60% higher at stations in high-poverty minority
neighborhoods than in high-poverty white neighborhoods.4
That is why it is critical to expand access to affordable public transportation. It reduces barriers
to employment, healthcare, education, and court compliance while helping prevent unnecessary
contact with enforcement systems driven by economic hardships.
II. Proposed Legislation
A. Int. 0248-2026 (Hudson): A Local Law to amend the administrative code of the
city of New York, in relation to automatic enrollment of eligible individuals in
city-created benefit programs.
NYCDS supports this legislation. The proposed legislation would help streamline enrollment
into the Fair Fares program for individuals already determined to be eligible by other
means-tested public benefits programs. Our clients face significant barriers in navigating
1Ayashah Anwar, Why NYC’
s Poor Funding Allocation Leads to Fare Evasions, Journal of Gender, Social Policy &
The Law (Jan. 27, 2025) at https://jgspl.org/why-nycs-poor-funding-allocation-leads-to-fare-evasions/.
2 Attorney General James Launches Investigaton into the NYPD for Alleged Targeting of Communities of Color on
NYC Subway (Jan. 13, 2020) at
https://ag.ny.gov/press-release/2020/attorney-general-james-launches-investigation-nypd-alleged-targeting-communi
ties.
3 Racial and Neighborhood Disparities in New York City Criminal Summons Practices, DCJ
https://datacollaborativeforjustice.org/work/policing/racial-disparities-in-new-york-city-criminal-summonses-2019-2
022/.
4 Id.complex and duplicative administrative processes in order to access essential benefits. Automatic
enrollment would reduce unnecessary administrative barriers and increase participation among
eligible New Yorkers. This would help ensure that our clients are able to more consistently
access transportation necessary to attend court appearances, medical appointments, treatment
programs, work, and other essential obligations.
B. Int. 0825-2026 (Marte): A Local Law to amend the administrative code of the city
of New York, in relation to the Department of Social Services issuing replacement
transit benefit cards
NYCDS supports this legislation. Many low-income and justice-involved New Yorkers
experience frequent property loss due to housing instability, shelter transfers, hospitalizations, or
displacement. The loss of a Fair Fares card can immediately disrupt a person’s ability to travel to
work, meet with counsel, access healthcare and treatment, or maintain employment. The process
of replacing a card and the associated fees can serve as a barrier to transportation for individuals
with little to no disposable income. Ensuring an accessible and affordable replacement process is
critical to maintaining continuity of transportation access for vulnerable New Yorkers, including
our clients.
IV . Conclusion
We urge the Council to pass Int. 0248-2026 (Hudson) and Int. 0825-2026 (Marte).
If you have any questions about my testimony, please email policy@nycds.org.